CUNA Responds to Banker's Wall Street Journal Attack
Last week, the Wall Street Journal posted an article on behalf of a Florida banking association that attacked the credit union tax status. CUNA, along with many credit unions, have responded to the banking association.
“Critics of the credit union tax status say credit unions use a tax advantage to create a stranglehold on the market, a claim that is patently false,” said CUNA President/CEO Jim Nussle. “While credit unions were established to provide many of the same services as banks, their tax status has always been about the structure and mission of credit unions; it has never been about the size or powers of credit unions. A credit union’s growth is a key indicator that it is doing exactly what Congress intended when it established their tax status: it is successfully serving its members.
“If the banking lobbyists had their way and credit unions were taxed, the consequences for consumers would be detrimental; for the government would be inconsequential; and for bankers would be a windfall,” Nussle added. “It isn’t hard to see why the bank lobbyists continue their quixotic bid to get Congress to tax credit unions. It’s equally easy to see why that would be a bad deal for everyone but the banks they represent.”
CUNA’s recent white paper on the credit union tax status shows that despite an estimate that the credit union “tax expenditure” is estimated at $1.7 billion in 2018, credit unions brought $15 billion in value to the financial services marketplace last year to members and non-members alike.
You can read more about the bankers recent attack on credit unions here.Go to main navigation