Below is a list of current state legislative issues.
State Solution for Data Breaches
(Support) Massive data breaches at the national and state levels have impacted hundreds of thousands of credit union members. Michigan credit unions continue to bear the costs of these breaches. While credit unions have been subject to strict federal privacy requirements since 1999, merchants have not been held to the same data standards. Inaction on data breach protections at the federal level has led to MCUL seeking a state solution. Currently, MCUL is working with interested parties and members of the legislature on data breach notification legislation introduced by Representative Diana Farrington. HB 4186-4187 would require a merchant who has experienced a data breach to provide notification to consumers within a 45-day timeframe. The legislation passed out of the House Financial Services Committee unanimously and is currently awaiting a hearing in House Ways and Means. The government affairs team is also working with members of the Senate to update/clean-up the current governing act — Identity Theft Protection Act. Those drafts are being circulated for sponsorship at this time and should be introduced shortly.
Escheats of Military Accounts
(Support) During conversations with multiple credit unions, it was brought to our attention that the DOD database does not allow credit unions to see if their members are active duty overseas military members. Verifying status is important in determining when to escheat funds in a dormant account to the state. If a member is active duty overseas military, the credit union is able to hold the funds in a dormant account for an additional two-year period (five years total). However, because our credit unions are unable to verify if a member is overseas or not, it becomes impossible to determine whether to hold the funds or escheat them to the state. Senator Tom Barrett introduced SB 125, which will remedy this situation and provide for a uniform period of dormancy prior to the escheating of funds for all active duty military regardless of whether they are overseas or stationed stateside. The legislation is currently up for a hearing in the Senate Families, Seniors and Veterans committee.
(Support) During conversations with multiple credit unions, it was brought to our attention that the DOD database does not allow credit unions to see if their members are active duty overseas military members. Verifying status is important in determining when to escheat funds in a dormant account to the state. If a member is active duty overseas military, the credit union is able to hold the funds in a dormant account for an additional two-year period (five years total). However, because our credit unions are unable to verify if a member is overseas or not, it becomes impossible to determine whether to hold the funds or escheat them to the state. Senator Tom Barrett introduced SB 125, which will remedy this situation and provide for a uniform period of dormancy prior to the escheating of funds for all active duty military regardless of whether they are overseas or stationed stateside. SB 125 provides a timeline of 5-year for all active duty military members. The legislation was voted unanimously out of the Senate Families, Seniors and Veterans committee and by a vote of 34-0-4 off the Senate floor. The legislation is now headed to the State House.
E-Recording Process Amendments
(Support) During enactment of e-notarization legislation last session, a separate issue arose related to the recording of electronic documents in those counties that have not yet opted to e-record. MCUL is working with interested parties on creating a pathway for electronic mortgage-related documents to be converted and recorded, or in the alternative, assisting those remaining counties in obtaining the resources they need to become e-capable for recording purposes. MCUL was successful in getting funding for fiscal year 2020 into the budget, however, the funding was moved by Ad Board during the budget process. Our team continues to work with the Governor and leadership to get the needed funded included as soon as practicable.
Longer-Term Small Dollar Loan Expansion (DPSTA)
(Reviewing) The payday lending/small-dollar loan industry has been working to expand the products and services they can provide to citizens of the State of Michigan. The legislation (HB 5097) as introduced by Representative Brandt Iden would allow current payday lenders to provide a new loan product under the Deferred Presentment Transaction Services Act (DPSTA). The new product would be a loan of not more than $2,500 with an 11% monthly interest rate. The loan term is for no less than 90 days. As in years past, our goal is to ensure that adequate consumer protections are put in place to protect consumers from predatory lending practices. At this time, our team is still reviewing the introduced legislation and will continue to work with all interested parties and credit union leaders.
Member Financial Exploitation
(Support) Attorney General Dana Nessel early in her tenure put together a task force to focus on protecting elders and vulnerable adults in Michigan. As a part of this taskforce, our team was tasked with working together with the MBA and other interested stakeholders to address member financial exploitation. The legislation (SB 464) introduced by Senator Peter Lucido would provide a framework in which credit unions and other financial institutions would be required to have a policy in place for how member financial exploitation is handled and a staff training program to tie into that policy. The legislation is undergoing a final review by our team and the MBA to ensure its effectiveness without placing increasing burden on financial institutions. At this time, the legislation has been referred to the Senate Insurance and Banking committee and is awaiting a hearing.
Below is a list of current state regulatory issues.
DIFS Model Bylaw Review
(Support) An outcome of our MCUA dialog with DIFS, this review would modernize the state's bylaws, providing clarity for credit unions who look to the bylaws for guidance. Amendments seek to provide clarity and consistency with the MCUA. Additionally, MCUL will seek to provide clarification on the voting process. Through this effort, MCUL, along with DIFS, will work to create a procedural toolkit for credit unions to assist with FOM expansion, mergers and charter conversions as a resource to Michigan’s state-chartered credit unions.
MCUL Examination Survey
Twice a year, in an effort to improve the examination experience and pre- and post-exam communication between credit unions and the state and federal regulators, MCUL seeks your input on your overall examination experience. You can take the survey here.
DIFS also has their own examination survey they encourage credit unions to complete. Providing feedback to the examination staff not only assists the examiners but credit unions and builds stronger relationships between credit unions and the regulators.
Guardianships/Conservatorship – SCAO
At the request of Holzman Law, the Michigan Credit Union League and representatives of Michigan State Court Administrative Office (SCAO) met to address the need for clarification and amendments to Letters of Guardianship.
A guardian is appointed by the court in a situation where a person is unable to care for themselves. The guardian is responsible for providing for the physical needs of the incapacitated person (the ward). At times courts have given a guardian authority to act upon financial affairs, but the letters of guardianship are unclear. Generally speaking a guardian has no financial authority as to the opening of accounts on behalf of the ward. However, in certain situations some courts are allowing guardians to exercise limited financial powers when:
- The guardian has been granted “full” powers; and
- No conservator has been appointed
Credit unions are often presented with letters of guardianship by individuals appointed as guardian over award, seeking access to an existing account or seeking to open a new account. Prior to accepting the letters of guardianship, financial institutions have been unable to determine if a conservator had been appointed without contacting the issuing court to identify if a conservatorship exists. Even in situations in which there is no conservator appointed the letters of guardianship do not presently, under Michigan law, give the guardian any financial power as it relates to the ward.
To ensure appropriate protections of consumer finances are in place it was determined that amending the current letters of guardianship would be the most viable option to address confusion. The amendments should specifically address what authorities have been granted prior to presentation to a financial institution.
MCUL is working with SCAO on potential process and forms amendments.
Go to main navigation